Some cities create housing areas by providing taller buildings. Others create housing by building houses on a wider area of land. What solution is better?

Numerous characters deem building skyscraper apartments is an optimal way in settling the congestion in big cities;

in contrast

, certain groups of people oppose and affirm constructing houses in rural areas is a practical approach in reducing the crowding in metropolises. I reckon erecting edifices is the best method in coping with

this

problem.

Firstly

, it is an inevitable fact that a nation having cities consisting of many multi-storey constructions prospers rapidly and earns a good name. As many people in business, industries, corporations and individual business runners concentrated in big cities, meaning tons of money is exchanged a day. So the country's economic power grows continuously.

For instance

, business centre cities, including Beijing, Tokyo, and Dubai are considered as a motor of their nations.

Hence

, we should implement

this

project to create free spaces and booming the economy.

Secondly

, we can

also

realize that many tourists from all over the world tend to visit major cities having edifices, as they attract travellers, adolescents, and even children as if a magnet. People are staggered by the beauty of metropolises

then

pay money to services provided by the city.

For example

, the most famous place among tourists are municipalities,

such

as Moscow, Beijing, and Singapore.

Besides

,

this

field makes up a considerable part of the nation's budget every year.

Thus

, it is beneficial to erect tall offices and buildings. In conclusion, from the ideas and examples given, I prefer constructing tall skyscrapers so that we have an opportunity to bloom the finance of every citizen and leave housing areas for our future generation.

Therefore

, I state again administrations should advocate

this

point of my view.