Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

There is no doubt that universities play a crucial role in building our

society

. While some people believe that education should be more geared towards professional subjects, others argue that it should be more of a personal choice. I strongly agree with the latter argument on

this

. On the one hand, universities equip our workforce with scientists, engineers and other professionals that drive our

society

to succeed. Countries without

such

experts can’t plan

tocreate

Correct your spelling

to create

and maintain

e

Add an article

the

show examples

ssential features of modern life.

For instance

, it's hard to imagine a

society

without transport and infrastructure facilities like trams, bridges and subways. There is going to be a shortage of these key workers if the choice is left to the students.

On the other hand

, I believe that only way by which a nation can have a motivated, passionate and competent group of professionals is by allowing students to choose their subjects. Providing free-choice gives people a sense of autonomy and research has shown that autonomy drives enthusiasm and a happier

society

.

As a result

,students have the impetus to master their subject rather than merely aim for good enough.

Conversely

, if universities limit students to one category of study,

then

the drive to excel that has to come with pursuing their passions will disappear. In conclusion,

although

it's critical for universities to continue supply

society

with professionals in fields of technology and science, I feel that

this

choice should be left with the students so as to develop motivation and excel in their work.