Government investment in the arts, such as music and theatre, is a waste of money. Governments must invest this money in public services instead. To what extent do you agree with this statement?

Art is considered to be the main core of the country’s civilization and heritage.

However

,

this

type of science could attract people all over the world, so governments have paid much more

money

on it rather than the significant daily services for the general population. In my point of view, the government should cover all essential services financially than they could pay attention to other entertained arts and theatres. There are reasonable factors of why general services have taken the

first

priority by the government.

First

of all, Offering the best, high technological services for normal citizen support him to work efficiently and rapidly.

Secondly

, once these governments seek to comfort their people by covering all their obvious requirements, the citizen would definitely aim to put his effort and behave to serve

this

country.

Therefore

, exchanging the benefits between the citizens and government is the significant advantage from the investing

money

on general services. Some people have claimed that art and theatre deserve much

money

more than general public services for two points.

Although

the art field expresses a type of entertainment, a lot of people extremely enjoys being in front of the most popular singer,

for instance

,Celine Dion, listen to her fascinated songs they love. Eventually,

this

might be for them one of the main necessity of their lives, especially in leisure times. Whatever was the need for art and artists, I think the

money

should go for serving human needs due to having a better world and comfortable environments. I believe that singers and actors can work in places where the general people are fairly have served by governments. Hopefully, no more complaining about

this

issue anymore;

otherwise

,crimes might be started in these countries.