Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later, and it is often argued that these are the best people to talk to teenagers about the dangers of committing a crime. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is true that ex-prisoners can become normal members of society. Some
people
harbour a belief that allowing
such
people
to speak to young
people
about their experience is the best way to discourage them from breaking the law. I am inclined to stand with proponents.
To begin
with, one of the main argument in its favour is that teenagers are more likely to accept the advice from someone who can share their experience.
For instance
, some offenders can tell millennials about how they become involved in crime, the danger of criminal lifestyles, what life in prison really like, and
also
eliminate any idea that young
people
may have about criminals' lives are appealing.
Moreover
, adolescents are often indifferent to the guidance given by older
people
, I imagine that most of them would be extremely keen to hear the stories from ex-offenders. Based on
such
compelling evidence, it appears that the vivid and shocking events of these stories are likely to have a powerful impact.
On the other hand
, there are alternatives to using reformed criminals to educate youngsters about crime would apply less effective. One option which police officers visit schools and talk to teenagers what happens to lawbreakers when they are caught, but teenagers are often reluctant to take advice from authorities. The other option, the school teachers speak to students about crime while it is doubtful that the students receive the sources of information about
this
topic are credible. These indicate that the students should have more opportunities to interact and ask questions with the ex-criminals who have the actual experiences. In conclusion, it is extensively believed that
people
who have turned their lives around after served in the prison sentence could help to deter youngsters from committing crimes.
Submitted by Charlotte on

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Read more in the eBook

The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »

* free ebook for Premium users

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

What to do next:
Try other services:

All the services are free for Premium users