Some people believe that all companies’ decisions should be decided by managers, while others think that it is better to include employees in decision making. Discuss both views and give your opinion?

It is considered by a few individuals that managers ought to be the only the ole part of decision-making policies in the organizations,

however

Linking Words

, others argue that other staff members should

also

Linking Words

engage in

this

Linking Words

process. I intend to discuss both these views in the following paragraphs and

then

Linking Words

mention my opinion.

To begin

Linking Words

with, the

first

Linking Words

school of thought asserts that owing to the vast experience and knowledge in business, chief executives fit well into the decision making role.

In other words

Linking Words

, not only they are familiar with an appropriate way of functioning of a firm but

also

Linking Words

they are aware of the strengths and weaknesses of their staff members. In fact, any other lower-level employee would not be able to provide justice to

this

Linking Words

responsibility.

For example

Linking Words

, it is unlikely for a software developer to give assistance in the financial

management

Use synonyms

of the organization, where a manager would obviously make the right decision regarding the inflow and outflow of cash.

Thus

Linking Words

,

this

Linking Words

makes it obvious that pertinent decisions should only be taken by

management

Use synonyms

.

However

Linking Words

,

on the other hand

Linking Words

, the

second

Linking Words

school of thought opposes

this

Linking Words

notion and endorses the fact that the engagement of

workers

Use synonyms

in the strategy-making procedures can prove vital aspect towards the success of a firm.

This

Linking Words

is primarily for a fact that

such

Linking Words

involvement of

workers

Use synonyms

would encourage them to point out some loopholes in the system, which, in turn, proves to be beneficial for the reputation of the company itself. A case in point is that if team members are engaged in the policy-making process, they can shed a clear light on the issues regarding the particular demand of customers since they are ones who actually deal with the clients in the

first

Linking Words

place.

Therefore

Linking Words

, in

this

Linking Words

way, employees can help in enhancing the level of organization, thereby proving it to be a better choice. I opine that the involvement of

workers

Use synonyms

in subject-matter decisions may bring enormous benefits to an organization. It is generally seen that when an employee is engaged in higher

management

Use synonyms

task, he feels valued and encouraged, the result of which, his productivity in the work

also

Linking Words

increases. Apart from

this

Linking Words

, indulging

workers

Use synonyms

in the strategy-making process

also

Linking Words

inspire them to remain in the company for a long time.

For instance

Linking Words

,

this

Linking Words

is especially true in the case of many multi-national organizations like Nigarro & Ciena, where employees' opinions are considered at priority before taking any project from clients. To conclude,

although

Linking Words

both notions are worth consideration, yet think that engagement of

workers

Use synonyms

in

management

Use synonyms

decisions seems to be more conducive in terms of motivation and attrition rate.