is one of the most precious natural
that people have. They have different views concerning whether the
should
the supply of it or not.
there is some truth in claiming that
governmentCorrect article usage
show examples
should not
fresh
water’s supplyCheck wording
show examples
, I am inclined to believe that governments
interveneVerb problem
show examples
in controlling
supply is important.
On the one hand, there are two principal reasons why some people believe that the
should not
the freshwater
. First and foremost, it is a renewable natural resource which existed since the
EarthCheck wording
show examples
creatureReplace the word
show examples
. To illustrate
, a recent study conducted by the American Environmental Reserve Association (AERA) in April 2019, which
analyzedChange the spelling
show examples
the
of 29 rivers and 100 lakes in different locations
onChange preposition
show examples
the world, found that these
bodies renew their
every 50
yearsPunctuation problem
show examples
as they are renewing about 10% of their
every 10 years. As
shows, the proportion of
bodies not only
areCorrect subject-verb agreement
show examples
they Correct pronoun usage
show examples
stable in terms of their amounts, but they
alsoVerb problem
show examples
renewable.
, regulating the provisions of
supply would not benefit the human being as
naturally
preserveCorrect subject-verb agreement
show examples
itself. Advocates of
approach are
keen to mention that enjoying the country’s natural
is a quintessential right of its citizens. They found controlling the
prevents them from/
to enjoyWrong verb form
show examples
their lives as
governmentCorrect article usage
show examples
monitor their
usage. They suggest initiatives to raise individuals’ awareness about the overuse of
. Some of them mention the
bills in Egypt,
, contain a diagram to show Egyptian citizens their country’s consumption of
whichPunctuation problem
show examples
motivates them to avoid
misuse.
, I found
thought is rather ill-founded since controlling
waterCorrect article usage
show examples
supply has a plethora of benefits.
, I would side with those who suppose that regulating freshwater supplies is crucial.
,
would benefit the environment. Sustaining the natural balance of the environment reflects positively on our
lifeFix the agreement mistake
show examples
. Climate Change,
, affects most of our daily activities as it has a negative impact on many species
whichPunctuation problem
show examples
deterioratedWrong verb form
show examples
their food chains and
causedWrong verb form
show examples
undesirable influences on
human’sCheck wording
show examples
life. If we had done a number of measures in advance, we would have prevented
thisFix the agreement mistake
show examples
natural
change Check wording
show examples
consequences.
makes it clear that
governmentCorrect article usage
show examples
should intervene to stop any irresponsible usage of
to save our habitat. An additional point is that
,Punctuation problem
show examples
controlling
supply would probably help us to face any natural threats.
, as we are living in a changing world, natural threats might happen
andPunctuation problem
show examples
we would need all of our
to tackle any potential problems.
, if the
plan its citizens' usage of
supply,
would save us.
, despite the existence of some
favoursCheck wording
show examples
against governmental
of freshwater supply
nature and
theirFix the agreement mistake
show examples
rights, I entirely support the idea of controlling
resource by the
because
has immediate benefits in sustaining the environment and our
lifeFix the agreement mistake
show examples
.