Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end world poverty and hunger. Others say that economic growth is damaging the environment and must stop now. Discuss both these points of view and give your own opinion.

After the industrialisation revolution, there is an increasing concentration on developing

economy

, as well as the concern of the environment. Some

people

believe that economic progress is more beneficial that can tackle problems of poverty and hunger, while others say that

this

kind of advancement is harmful to the ecosystem and must stop now. In the following essay, I will discuss both views with proper examples and draw a reasonable conclusion. On one hand,

people

who suppose to forbid economic growth may argue that there are several drawbacks of

such

kind of advancement. An obvious example can be viewed by pollution done by factories, vehicles and households. Carbon dioxides emitted by those group boost the growth of temperature due to greenhouse effects, leading to melting of ice glaciers in polar areas. I hold a pessimistic opinion that human may not cope with an even small rise of the sea level well. Coastal cities would be flooded, especially for countries who do not have the means to protect low-lying areas, and

people

who live there would lose their jobs, homes, and even life.

Thus

, it seems logical to slow down the economic growth for the purpose of preventing that situation above.

On the other hand

, admittedly, the improvements in the

economy

bring residents numerous advantages.

Firstly

, a healthy

economy

can result in job creation, high level of employment, and higher salaries for citizens.

Secondly

, economic progress ensures that governments have more funds to spend on infrastructure.

For instance

, a government with higher revenue can invest more in construction of public transport system which can reduce emissions of greenhouse gases, healthcare system which benefits the whole society and poverty alleviation, which reduces the poverty gap and guarantees

people

with lower income to living with better conditions. The final merit is that a strong

economy

helps the country’s standing on the global stage, in terms of its political strength and trading power. In conclusion, I believe that economic advancement should be never stopped, because it can help the community to treat its citizens well in terms of living standards, and a country with greater economic potentials is more likely to tackle the environmental problem caused.

Thus

, the pros of

such

an improvement outweigh its cons.