For some time now, it has become a topic of debate as a section of
the Correct article usage
show examples
society believes that paying excessively to the senior-most staff of an organization is completely acceptable,
others hold a view that
is not fair to the junior workers. In my opinion, I completely agree that a huge compensation to executives should be regarded positively.
On the one hand, many have valid arguments against higher
toChange preposition
show examples
executive-level
. First and foremost, everyone in a firm works around 9 hours a day,
the reason everyone should be paid
.
is because as per the IT markets' standard,
on each level have to clock at least 45 hours per week regardless of their positions and Infosys is the prime example of
.
, without any effort
ofChange preposition
show examples
the workforce
onChange preposition
show examples
lower positions, seniors can not drive a company because most of the technical work is done by the juniors and higher-level
just deliver that to clients.
,
with less
have
invested a prodigious amount of money and time to acquire the required
and educational degree;
, attractive
to seniors is not a fair process followed by companies.
, people who advocate the view that higher
toChange preposition
show examples
directors and VPs have certain reasons behind their thinking.
, running a firm smoothly requires a team of workers with extensive
and knowledge about different industries to deal with numerous international clients and to crack any deal in no time. These senior-most people have been working in different sectors for ages so their
and work commitments should be compensated with handsome
.
, if a director fails at any point means an entire organization would suffer. Mahindra Satyam,
, has a similar story where
CFOCorrect article usage
show examples
failed to run the company
, lower staff had to suffer as they were terminated.
, I wholeheartedly agree that attractive remuneration to directors is completely fair and the right approach.
,
many still argue that paying excessive
to the topmost worker is unfair to juniors, I am completely convinced that
is definitely a fair option as these people are behind running the business properly and
the workers in lower positions are earning.