It is commonly believed that
students
should focus on studying certain subjects, Use synonyms
such
as science and technology, at the university rather than wasting their time on studying less important courses. In my opinion, I disagree with Linking Words
this
statement because it prevents them from following their dreams and passion.
Advocates of forcing Linking Words
students
to take scientific courses claim that it would significantly contribute to creating a better future for them and their society. They may assert that a specific area of studies, Use synonyms
such
as medicine, engineering, and information technology, provides more job opportunities, career progression, and financial security. On the societal level, the intensive emphasis on these particular subjects could lead to bridge the gap in skills and knowledge in which economy need them for Linking Words
further
advancement. Linking Words
This
would result in improving the quality of a student's life and creating enormous future prosperity for society.
Linking Words
On the other hand
, opponents of Linking Words
this
view argue that Linking Words
students
should have the freedom to opt for what they want to study. Use synonyms
This
is because they are more likely to be more creative and innovative when they study a course they have more interest in it. If a university imposes restrictions on their studies preferences, they are more likely to quit or have less motivation for achieving success in the future. The Linking Words
students
of art and history may change the way people are thinking about life and encourage them to always look out of the box. Thereby, Use synonyms
this
kind of inspiration can not be found in other scientific fields, which sorely focus on numbers and theories.
To sum up, despite the advantages of forcing Linking Words
students
to take particular courses, it seems sensible that studying a course of their choice would help them to stimulate their development and broaden their horizons.Use synonyms
khadega.amer09