Some argue younger people are not suitable for important positions in the government, while others think this is a good idea. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

There is a heated debate about whether the younger generation is qualified for important positions in the

government

. In

this

essay, I will discuss the viewpoints of both supporters and opponents, as well as give my own opinion. On the one hand, a few

people

insist (khang2) that the young are not suitable for critical positions in the

government

for the following main reason. Young

people

are characterized by immature and inexperienced nature so that they tend to make decisions without enough consideration. As a consequence, if they are in charge of important departments in the

government

, their imprudent actions may give rise to serious results and a high price which they would have to pay.

On the other hand

, some

people

argue that younger

people

should be given more opportunities to do

government

tasks because young

people

are receptive to new notions and innovations. They are expected to bring their innovation style to the operation of the

government

which is commonly considered to be rigid and conservative.

For instance

, in some cities, young officials are taking advantage of online social networks to interact with residents, and

therefore

deepen mutual understanding as well as enhance the ties of the

government

and the public. As I see it, the young should be encouraged to take more responsibilities for

government

work since

this

is an effective way to change the stereotyped

government

and improve public service.

Although

young

people

are likely to make mistakes due to their lack of experience,

this

is how they grow and become competent for their jobs in the years to come.