In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Recently, there has been widespread controversy about the decision on improving the
transportation
structure in many countries. One claimed
that is
better to use the huge volume of funds on building rail line stations between cities.
However
, some think that the maintenance of current public transit is important. These are two contrasting viewpoints and
this
essay will discuss both viewpoints while final opinion will be drawn. To start with, supporters of the view that more railway stations should be constructed thought that
this
will aid in reducing emissions of pollutants to the air.
This
implies that there will be an improvement in the health quality of the citizens.
For instance
, Researchers in health care service claimed a significant reduction in patients diagnosed with asthma after the introduction of rail line system in the
country
.
In addition
to
this
, the
transportation
of goods
such
as farm products from one city to another will be convenient.
Likewise
, products that are produced locally will be distributed widely within the
country
easily. In fact,
this
can boost the economic status of the
country
with these market strategies.
For example
, Dangote Enterprise in Nigeria uses railway stations in transferring cement products.
Hence
, it is clearly seen that a huge amount of fund should be diverted for the building of train lines.
Conversely
, opponents of
this
view alluded that available public
transportation
structure should be ameliorated by budgeting with a huge amount of capital because it will help to reduce congestion on highways.
In other words
,
transportation
on road will be easier and conducive due to less traffic jam. To cite an example, Recent construction of overhead Bridges on highways in Nigeria control traffic problem and make travelling convenient.
Furthermore
, if more expenses are allocated for already public transports
such
as the widening of roads, distribution of new buses to drivers will assist in decreasing the occurrence of road accidents.
This
means that the safety of the citizens will be secured.
Consequently
, budgeting a huge amount of money to available transit in the
country
will be beneficial to the citizens at large. In conclusion,
this
essay discussed two contrasting points about the importance of diverting fund to the building the railways or maintaining the current transports system. In my opinion, I believe that connecting cities by building a new railway station will be preferable because the environment will be safe from air pollution and
transportation
of good will be easier.
Submitted by Ayoqueen on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Your opinion

Don’t put your opinion unless you are asked to give it.

If the question asks what you think, you MUST give your opinion to get a good score.

Don’t leave your opinion until the conclusion.

Here are examples of instructions that require you to give your opinion:

...do you agree or disagree?...do you think...?...your opinion...?

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • infrastructure
  • efficient
  • congestion
  • sustainable
  • environmentally friendly
  • connectivity
  • economic growth
  • public transportation
What to do next:
Look at other essays: