Effects of size heterogeneity, feeding/fasting strategy and stocking density modulation on body performance and cannibalism rate of Persian sturgeon (Acipenser persicus) larvae

Persian
sturgeon
(
Acipenser
persicus) is one of the most valuable
species
in the southern parts of the Caspian Sea.
However
, regrettably, the population of
this
species
currently declined due to poaching and overfishing for its meat or caviar harvesting, environmental pollution and destruction of spawning grounds in the Caspian Sea. The Persian
sturgeon
has been considered an endangered
species
in IUCN Red List (IUCN, 2012) and
thus
for five decades, the conservation of Persian
sturgeon
is carried out by artificial propagation through applying appropriate larval rearing techniques to supply fingerlings. Feeding strategies are considered crucial stimuli, during
sturgeon
larviculture
. To establish an appropriate larval production strategy, manipulation of feeding patterns conceived by food restriction effects on green
sturgeon
(
Acipenser
medirostris) through pursuing fingerlings metabolic and homeostasis responses (Lin, Huang, Deng, Lee, Liang, & Hung, 2019), as well as the importance of initial feeding evaluation for growth and survivability in Siberian
sturgeon
(
Acipenser
baeri)
larvae
(Gisbert & Williot, 1997), and white
sturgeon
(
Acipenser
transmontanus) (Deng, Koshio, Yokoyama, Bai, Shao, Cui, & Hung, 2003). Thereby, the feeding strategy could be a noticeable factor over
larviculture
.
Although
fish
growth performance and survival are mostly discussed in
larviculture
technology, knowledge in
sturgeon
aggressive nature would be definitely required more attention.
Cannibalism
is considered a special form of killing and predation, particularly among
fish
larvae
.
This
aggressive behaviour leads to an excessive mortality rate in
larviculture
which is well-documented in teleosts (Manica, 2002;
Baras
, Kestemont, & Mélard, 2003; Puvanendran 2008; Manley, Rakocinski, Lee, & Blaylock, 2015; Leu, Tai, Meng, Tang, Wang, & Tew, 2018).
Cannibalism
can be definitely altered by a number of environmental and population factors (Naumowicz, Pajdak, Terech-Majewska, & Szarek, 2017) including feeding
frequency
or food availability (Manley et al., 2015),
fish
stocking
frequency
(Folkvord, 1991;
Baras
et al., 2003) or even length heterogeneity (Kestemont, Jourdan, Houbart, Mélard, Paspatis, Fontaine, Cuvier, Kentouri, &
Baras
, 2003; Ribeiro, Forsythe, & Qin, 2015; Leu et al., 2018). These literally cause either prey
frequency
or production weight gain consequences (Hecht & Pienaar, 1993; Kestemont et al., 2003;
Baras
et al., 2003). Control of the outlined factors is rooted in knowing
larviculture
based on
species
that have direct impacts on production, rearing expenditure and costs of facilities.
Furthermore
, the possibility of feeding
frequency
and its effect on excessive aggression behaviour of teleosts is proved in African catfish Clarias gariepinus
larvae
(Kaiser, Weyl, & Hecht, 1995) and yellowtail flounder Limanda ferruginea (Dwyer, Brown, Parrish, & Lall, 2002). In some
species
such
as juvenile Asian seabass Lates calcarifer (Ribeiro et al., 2015), Eurasian perch Perca fluviatilis (Król & Zieliński, 2015) and wild Atlantic bluefin tuna Thunnus thynnus
larvae
(Uriarte, Johnstone, Laiz-Carrión, García, Llopiz, Shiroza, Quintanilla, Lozano-Peral, Reglero, & Alemany, 2019)
cannibalism
rate was fluctuated by
fish
density. Moderation of
cannibalism
rate may be
also
controlled by optimizing the stocking density. Stocking density
also
regarded as a negative variable for juvenile Chinese
sturgeon
(
Acipenser
Sinensis) (Long, Zhang, Ni, Liu, Wu, & Wang, 2019) and Amur
sturgeon
(
Acipenser
schrenckii) (Ni, Wen, Li, Chi, Bu, Ren, Zhang, Song, & Ding, 2014) performance, resistance and survivability. The effect of size differentiation is another contributing option confirmed in the aggressive behaviour of Asian seabass fry (Ribeiro & Qin, 2013), Eurasian perch and pikeperch Sander lucioperca (Król et al., 2013). In many cases, the main target of aquaculture is keeping size heterogeneity for facilitating harvesting or even feeding (Biswas, Thirunavukkarasu, Sundaray, & Kailasam, 2010; Chiu, Chu, Huang, Ho, Huang, & Yeh, 2020),
however
Add the comma(s)
,however
show examples
the effects of size sorting should be elucidated properly during
larviculture
.
Submitted by roosta6787 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: