People's opinions differ as to whether institutions and companies should allow their employees to dress by desires. While I agree that the other merits and the quality of accomplishments are more crucial than appearance, I would argue that the attire code might bring certain benefits in certain organizations.
Appearance could not be the critical factor to evaluate the success of an organization.
Instead
, work placement, quality of products, social contributions are the decisive parameters in appreciating a company. Take Facebook, Linking Words
for example
, people all acknowledge its grandness and widespread influence around the world of Linking Words
this
technological giant, and it does not have a uniform. Even its chairman, Mark Zuckerberg is rarely seen in a glamorous vest or suit. Linking Words
Furthermore
, casual costume, or allowing workers to clothe what they are willing, would make them feel more comfortable, results in increasing working productiveness.
Dress code, Linking Words
on the other hand
, is essential in some occupations. Police officers, doctors, and nurses, Linking Words
in particular
, are required to wear uniforms. These uniforms, to some degree, provide practical or safety functions, but more importantly, they represent the person's position or role in society. Linking Words
Similarly
, a lawyer, politician, or school principal may choose to wear formal clothing to portray an image of authority, prestigiousness, and diligence. I hold the belief that people prefer to see these professionals in smart, formal attire, even if it is not strictly necessary.
In conclusion, I advocate the trend toward free dress to workers, but in certain professions or sectors of society, I still believe that the uniform has a significant role to play.Linking Words
maithuctuan