There is a common conviction that efforts
makes to support
are worthless, and
it is more beneficial to allocate a budget on public
. While I partially agree with
think that the
sector has a high potential to benefit the country.
On the one hand, the reason why governments may favour supporting public
on top of
field is guaranteed to bring evident improvements to the population. Since the public is highly concerned about public
as hospital, schools, transportation, pouring money on these fields is a straightforward method for
to feed the needs of citizens.
, it does not take long until changes will be noticeable to the public, unlike
, where benefits may come gradually.
On the other hand
, investments made to back up
as music or filming industries, promise a potentially high return on investment rates. Usually, there is a lot of fortune that goes around celebrities
as singers or filmmakers.
can take advantage of them in terms of their contributions to its budget. Another point to consider is that entertainment
as theatres or music is an integral part of society. Eliminating them from the lives of people may cause a decline in a social and cultural level of a population.
cannot neglect to fund the
To conclude, at a glance, it may seem that investing in public
has always been a priority since it brings obvious advantages to society.
have to be considerate about funding art due to its role in the community and its high profit if continuously supported.