Some people give more importance to artists ( painters, writers, musicians) in the current age of rapidly developing technology and science. What do you think? Do people prefer arts to technology in your view?

With the exponential increase in the development of science and
technology
,
people
are becoming less creative, social and friendly. Resultantly, some individuals give more priority to
artists
in
this
day and age in order to lead a socio-cultural life and hold the traditional values. I
nonetheless
deem that
people
should not give more importance to arts over
technology
. In
this
contemporary era, artistic activities-
such
as dancing, singing, painting, writing, to name but a few are considered valuable skills in that these activities help individuals to work with others in the community.
This
results in creating strong bonding through regular communications and cooperation. To put it simply,
artists
no only show their creativity and hold cultural heritage but
also
help to build a cooperative society. To cite an example, Japanese
people
give special honour to all
artists
of their nation, for they believe that they lead a less robotic life these days only because of high-quality dramas, songs and so on. Plausible though it may seem that
artists
should be given more preference for building a united and cultural community, never can they contribute to the economic development. To be more precise, without state-of-the-art
technology
it is
next
to impossible for a country to compete in the dog-eat-dog global market. Admittedly, artistic activity is essential for entertainment but it cannot help to lead n epicurean and sumptuous life. To exemplify, an empirical study conducted by Cambridge University reveals that countries that were not given value to
technology
are far behind in the world and are more dependent on the developed nations. In essence, much as
artists
and their works facilitate building a united socio-friendly state,
people
should give more importance to
technology
in order to survive and win in the cutthroat world.
Submitted by shawlin90 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: