In some countries children have very strict rules of behaviour, while in other countries they are allowed to do almost anything they want. To what extent should children have to follow rules?

It is irrefutable that today's

children

are the policymakers of tomorrow.

Children

have to live within very tough

rules

of behaviour in few nations, while other countries do not impose

such

rules

. In my opinion, I support the former view and the upcoming paragraphs will shed a light on the aforementioned notions with examples. On the one hand,

children

are immature to distinguish between right and wrong.

Also

, As teenagers do not have an understanding of the real world, they are easily influenced by drug dealers to take drugs at their early age.

For instance

, a survey recently conducted by BBC News has revealed that the 40% of the

children

in Europe started taking drugs at their secondary schooling in the

last

decade.

Moreover

, if parents do not discipline their

children

, they would not respect their teachers in schools as well.

Therefore

, stringent

rules

are a must for the

children

to shape their career and behaviour.

On the other hand

, those who provide full freedom to teenagers argue that the restrictions can hamper the overall physical and psychological growth of

children

.

Furthermore

, they opine that a free mind would learn things quickly. Though there may be some negatives of

this

approach,

this

is good for their future.

Thus

, giving space to the younger generation is a key to success. In conclusion, we have discussed both views in the details and found that both sides have their pros and cons. In my view, If

children

live in disciplines and follow the

rules

of behaviours, they would not only achieve success in their career but

also

become

a

Correct article usage

apply

show examples

good human being.