Science can now offer people a life expectancy of close to one hundred years or ‎even more. Some people view it in a positive light, but others believe it creates ‎some problems. Discuss both views, and give your own opinion.

It is frequently believed that advancements in science will eventually lead the public ‎on the
planet
to have a lifespan of about a century or even more than that. While ‎some public agrees with
this
, there are others who strongly disagree with it. In my ‎opinion,
this
increase in the lifespan of humans will aggravate the existing
planet
‎problems
further
.‎ On the one hand, some believe that the public should live for 100 years or even ‎more than that as it will help them to stay with their loved ones for an extended ‎period of time . As there will be fewer deaths, the
planet
will be a better place to ‎live in with no sorrows and sadness over the death of the near ones.
Moreover
, ‎the life span of the intelligent and genius public can be extended which will help ‎nature get a more knowledgeable public and they can offer their guidance through ‎their experiences of life to the upcoming generations.‎
However
, the aforementioned benefits are negligible when we consider the ‎downsides of living forever. To start with, after the community reach the age of 75 or 80 ‎they have hardly anything left to do or experience.
This
will make their lives ‎monotonous.
In addition
,
this
trend will lead to population explosion and will be ‎detrimental to already existing global problems like food shortage, pollution and ‎global warming, water crisis, accommodation issues and traffic congestion to ‎mention some. The
planet
resources will be depleted at a much faster rate with ‎more public simultaneously consuming them. Another aspect to
this
is that with ‎more proportion of the population in the elderly group the government will need ‎to invest more for social benefits of old public and
this
will affect the economy of ‎the nation.‎ To conclude, the public may vary in their opinion, but I think that science should not ‎go against the law of nature and extend the lifespan of humans as it will worsen ‎the economy and environment of the
planet
. ‎
Submitted by arash.dejkameh on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: