Children who grow up in families, which are short of money, are better prepared with the problems of adult life than children who are brought up by wealthy parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is often believed that rich families’

children

are unable to deal with their issues as compared to those who live in poor families. Does

this

belief hold any logic? Considering the positives

such

as better handling of issues and

value

of the money, I find the aforementioned statement to be logically sound.

To begin

with,

Children

can better manage the issue in their adult life who belong to poor families. The reason behind

this

is that they have experienced many problems in their early life and they can act in a better way according to their knowledge.

As a result

,

such

an experienced person has not only confidence but

also

present with a more practical approach towards any difficulty.

For example

, a University survey has shown that 60% of adults can handle their issues more competently when they have been through it during their childhood.

Besides

the above-mentioned fact, Underprivileged

children

understand the

value

of money. Owing to

this

, they had faced financial problems and learnt about monetary worth before maturity. While

on the other hand

who have grown up in a luxurious environment, they cannot assess the

value

of every single penny.

Therefore

, young ones who lived in week economical conditions can prove as better investors in their adulthood.

For instance

, had my friend, John, not gained the best

value

for money in his teenage; he would not have been an excellent financier in the stock market. In conclusion, since the features

such

as to cope with adverse situations and estimation of financers appropriately, I am convinced that

children

living in scarcity of wealth can better succeed in life.