Small Businesses Should Avoid Recruiting Young Women Who Do Not Have Their Own Family In Order To Avoid Paying Maternity Leave. To what extend do you agree or disagree

Earned maternity leaves are the rights of women of reproductive age.Companies should entitle these special leaves for their workforce who falls in

this

category.Some economists argue that developing industries should not hire females who may require maternal benefits as

this

may cause a huge financial burden for them.

This

essay completely disagrees with the above-mentioned view.Reasons for my disagreements are

firstly

gender inequality in the selection and

secondly

loss of great talents for employers. On the one hand ,discrimination in the selection process is against the law of land.If a company opts to single out an applicant just because she is single and young is not following regulations of the employment code of ethics.Any differentiation other than sheer talent is not recommended in many countries.

For example

,European Union passed multiple ordinances to ensure gender equality in the workplace.

Although

this

practice is still prevalent in many small scale industries.One of the latest reports in The Guardian newspaper illustrates the extends of

this

issue.

In addition

to that,declining female applicants on the basis of their marital status and age may cause a major setback for that firm.Many highly efficient girls could not get jobs because of

this

faulty decision by managers.

This

in turn affects the business of that small scale industries.

However

,many directors are still continuing

this

trend.

For instance

,many companies in the UK still not hiring young females. To sum

this

up,gender or age should not be the factors while considering an applicant.In my point of view the performance of individual matters more than any other criteria.