In recent years, the matter of
has become controversial. While some people are against the idea of these basic
being run by
whose target is
, many people
favorChange the spelling
show examples
the
of
-seeking
over medical
. Personally, I am not on the same side of corporation
over the
.
essay is aimed to explain the reasons behind the view that
should not run the
.
To start off, when
are in the hand of people who want
, citizens can be charged extremely high prices for simple things
as a visit to the physician.
because
put
above all, so they will not
about the
of the
they give to the general public. To illustrate, in America where most healthcare
belongChange the verb form
show examples
to private
, the
for medicines and other
is much higher in comparison with that in European nations.
, when American citizens experienced any
issue, they will not want to be admitted to a hospital or even call an ambulance due to the
.
, when the matter of
is in the hands of corporations, they will try their hardest to earn the most
out of every
productsChange to a singular noun
show examples
by reducing qualities. Fewer
products can greatly decrease the
forChange preposition
show examples
material and assembly. To give an illustration, millions of mechanical ventilation machines have been sent from China to India in the Covid-19 pandemic, some of whose components are replaced by lower
, less expensive alternatives.
, with the
of corporations, the
will be monopolized by a small number of big
, which limits the
patientsChange to a genitive case
show examples
options for where and who they can be treated. As monopoly in
prevents the emergence of a more efficient
, patients still have to pay more because there
isChange the verb form
show examples
no more options. To give an example, Johnson & Johnson holds a lead in developing medical devices, pharmaceuticals, and consumer packaged goods, with 2 more
that
the
systems in America.
To summarize, due to the
,
, and monopoly of medical
and products, I am against corporations having
over the
.
Nick, 12:33 PM
Some countries have introduced a
to limit working
for
. Why is
introduced? Do you think it is a positive or
a Remove the article
show examples
negative development?
A number of nations have imposed a
restricting the number of
can spend at work.
limit is made because of the declining
of
. Personally, I believe that
is a beneficial development.
To start off, in recent years there is an increase in
problems caused by sitting too long in an
. The main cause of
is the lack of opportunities for any physical activities or exercises of
, which is due to overtime and long work
. To illustrate, without any
for exercises,
can suffer from obesity, joints inflammation, and cardiovascular diseases.
, governments have to restrain the business hour to give
enough
for exercises to maintain their well-being.
, work-life balance is
crucial, as a lack of communication with family or friends can lead to psychological issues, which hinders both society and families. Having a chance to take
of themselves can boost the productivity of the
significantly, as well as prolong their available work span.
to
, more
with their kids can greatly strengthen families bonds.
that must be spent in offices can be utilized for taking
childrenChange preposition
show examples
, as they require a lot of
.
To summarize, imposing restraint on the duration of the
hour brings about many benefits in different aspects of societies. As
have more
, they can do more exercise to maintain fitness and improve their relationships.