Some people think that planting trees in open spaces in cities and town is more important than building houses. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The issues that should be regarded for the development of

cities

abound. It is believed b a group of

people

that the presence of more plants in open

spaces

is more crucial than domestic

buildings

. I sit on the fence in

this

regard since each of them would have specific positive outcomes for

citizens

. On the one hand,

trees

would benefit

people

in various ways.

Firstly

, these

trees

could compensate

the

Change preposition

for the

show examples

environmental crises which are the consequences of modern lifestyle.

Trees

are capable of purifying air on a daily basis. In doing so, rarely would

people

suffer from asthma or climate change since pollution which

the

Correct your spelling

they

show examples

have generated would be dramatically mitigated. So the more

trees

are planted, the cleaner the air would be.

In addition

,

citizens

would be healthier both physically and mentally if sufficient numbers of

trees

were planted in open

spaces

. These places would be frequently used by

people

for either recreational or leisure activities. Regarding exercise, individuals would be enticed to walk or run there leading to

Replace the word

losing

show examples

loosing

Correct your spelling

losing

show examples

weight. As far as mental diseases are concerned, spending time in nature and merely looking at

trees

would boost confidence and release anxiety.

Thus

, not only would plants alleviate environmental costs, but they would

also

lead to

strengthening

Add an article

the strengthening

a strengthening

show examples

of

citizens

both physically and mentally. Constructing extra residential

buildings

in open

spaces

,

however

, could be

also

beneficial for

citizens

.

Firstly

, it would prevent

people

from travelling long distances.

People

usually have preoccupied themselves with either work or study which require their presence in offices or educational institutions. So they should inevitably travel to those venues. The length of their journeys would be dramatically high unless new apartments were built in open

spaces

. Since the majority of their destinations are located in city

centers

Change the spelling

centres

show examples

while they vulnerably should accommodate in suburb areas.

Moreover

, the price of

houses

would dramatically increase on the conditions that

citizens

faced the dearth of

houses

in

cities

. Since

people

would compete for purchasing or renting the ones that are located in

cities

to avoid moving into suburban apartments. In doing so, the owners of

houses

consequently

increase the costs of their

houses

.

This

could be utterly detrimental to the economy of countries.

Therefore

, both individuals and

economy

Correct article usage

the economy

show examples

would be prone to

lack

Correct article usage

a lack

show examples

of residential

buildings

unless new ones were constructed in open

spaces

. In conclusion, I partly agree and partly disagree with the notion that planting

trees

in open

spaces

of

cities

has priority over constructing domestic

buildings

.

Although

environmental and health issues would be reduced,

citizens

and

economy

Correct article usage

the economy

show examples

would encounter some difficulties.