One part of society
the government should construct
can be used without payment while the other
disagrees with that idea because the
is the cheapest source of knowledge. I am of the opinion that
should be established because they can be more beneficial in numerous ways.
On the one hand, people argue that free
should be proliferated across the country by the authorities.
can serve society in numerous ways.
, they can attract the younger generations and help them in their education.
and serious environment which is crucial for an effective learning process. To give an example from personal experience, I subscribed to a library in my hometown and it changed my study routine drastically and my exam results have improved since
On the other hand
, some advocate the idea that online resources are cheaper and more efficient
trying the build public
is to squander the government’s funds. The
is easy to reach and it has almost illimitable sources of knowledge. Having said that, we must take into account that the
can easily turn into a source of distraction.
, a recent study has incontrovertibly shown that children who study for their lessons with a computer become more easily distractible than their peers. I think
requires less money it can not be more efficient than
In conclusion, some say free
are necessary and should be funded by the governments, the others take the opposite stance and defend the concept of not pouring the government’s money down the drain and using the
. In my opinion, free
should be established because they are more efficient and can not be replaced by the