School should not force children to learn a foreign language. To what extent do you agree with this statement?

It is undoubtedly that a foreign language is essential for children.

However

, the school should not compel the student to learn a secondary dialect because

this

leads to overpressure to pupils who language-learning. I partially agree with

this

statement for the following reasons.

To begin

with, the school has not forced to pupils study a secondary lingo because students already have a pressure which is academic subject while another without familiar linguistic sometimes getting boredom

thus

, they never are enthusiastic.

For example

, Japanese students do have not to learn any other dialect, they only study their's mother tongue

as a result

, many technological innovations are found by Japanese. To be more precise, the institution should not force to study an abroad tongue, the pupils might be stopped to studying.

Conversely

, nowadays, mother sound is only not enough to survive because every aspect needs any abroad linguistic or an international sound.

For example

, English is occupied in all over the world

hence

, the children should be studied

thus

, they might be gotten a better future undoubtedly.

Moreover

, the department should not be forced to learn but they give suggestions to follow

this

course because the child is not a mature person while they are studying and they never know about what will happen in upcoming days

hence

, the school should encourage to review an abroad linguistic but should not force. To conclude, certainly, the institution should not compel to review a secondary dialect but a foreign sound is most significant for children future.

Hence

, I strongly partially agree with

this

statement in the above-mentioned details. I hope

this

trend is conducive to the

next

generation.