Some organisations believe that their employees should dress smartly. Others value quality of work above appearance. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

It is believed by some people that office staff ought to dress smartly,

on the other hand

, some of the individuals valued the

quality

of the

work

rather than the outlook. In

this

essay, both views will be discussed. In my opinion, both outlook and smart

work

are important for making progress in the workplace. On one hand, it is assumed by some companies that workers should wear dress properly.

Although

it is not only a unique requirement for the organisations, it creates a difference in the case of some of the occupation statuses.

For example

, a news presenter must always have well dressed, because, smarter outlooking is mandatory for a news presenter. Again, appearance is most important for an actor than

work

quality

.

Hence

, appearance plays a significant role in some cases.

On the other hand

, some organizations valued the

work

quality

of the employees in comparison to attraction. Actually, it requires harder, technological, and logical skills for working in some companies.

For example

, in Google, Facebook always trying to hire IT-based qualified personnel. Again, a data scientist must have to be knowledgeable in

the

Remove the article

apply

show examples

statistics and programming sector with some basic math skills. A university lecturer needs to be expertise in a specific sector

such

as biology, physics, biostatistics, etc.

Thus

, the

quality

of the

work

also

has significant values in some cases over the outlook. To conclude, both appearance and

work

quality

is important depending on the organization type.

In other words

, one

quality

can't outweigh the other for achieving a

further

position in that organization.