Some people think traditional games are better than modern games in helping children develop their abilities. To what extent do you agree?

Playing

games

is part of everyone's childhood and it is said that they aid in enhancing a child's ability. Some suggest that these skills are acquired in conventional

games

and not in video

games

.

This

statement holds true and it will be discussed why it has strong ground. These long-established entertainments are not only amusing but they are

also

beneficial to kids. When performing these activities, they need to be physically active as well as communicating between friends.

Hence

, these sports promote both physical health and social skills.

Furthermore

, these

games

indirectly reinforce their body immunities as they spend a lot of energy moving across vast space but

also

they are in direct contact with foreign particles.

For example

, hide and seek is a popular game in my country where it requires several participants and it demands considerable physical effort.

Therefore

, traditional

games

play an important role in a child's development.

Although

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

electronic

games

are said to develop creativity and critical thinking, they can be rather harmful to kids. They are usually played on electronic devices

such

as PlayStation and Nintendo which are somehow effortless to play.

Nevertheless

,

instead

of learning skills, youngsters can rather get addicted to these divertissements leading sometimes to isolation. Video gamers tend to be introverted and lack social interactions. They can

also

express frustration and laziness.

For instance

, in America, a large majority of young people spend at least four hours per day on video

games

.

As a result

, these entertainments are rather unproductive. In conclusion, the old

games

outweigh completely the modern ones in terms of benefits.

However

,

games

that are played on a screen can

also

be beneficial to some extent.