Some people think instead of preventing climate change, we should find ways to live with it. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Climate

change

has been an international issue that has drawn extensive attention. Some

people

argue that

people

should seek methods to adapt to it rather than reverse the changing trend. I largely agree with

this

view, though the latter may have long-term benefits.

First

of all, it is essential for humankind to learn to live with

climate

change

since it is unrealistic to see an immediate improvement in the

climate

. The fact that human behaviour causes damage to nature has a long history.

People

have released tremendous amounts of greenhouse gases after the industrial revolution, which is accumulated in the atmosphere,

thus

making global warming an inevitable trend. With

such

exploitation and destruction of the environment

having

Change the form of the verb

has

show examples

become a reality, it is necessary for

people

to develop new technologies or lifestyles right away, in order to co-exist with

climate

change

and maintain a high living standard in the meantime.

Furthermore

, adapting to

climate

change

means more conservative policies on environmental protection, thereby preventing a straightaway collapse of countries’ economies. Strict measures must be taken to bring the obstruction of

climate

change

into reality, including cutting down the use of fossil fuels,

for example

.

As a result

, plants will experience less productivity for lack of adequate available power, since harnessing wind, solar and water power relies heavily on geographic locations and weather conditions, neither of which can be easily controlled.

Also

Add a comma

,Also

show examples

they have to endure the capital shortage for the increasing costs from purchasing new equipment to use alternative energy.

Such

low productivity definitely holds back economic growth. Considering the consequence of

this

demotivated state of the economy, fewer funds can be invested in environmental preservation, which only makes the plan hard to proceed

.

Change preposition

with.

show examples

On the other hand

, halting

climate

change

may fundamentally solve the problem when taking the long view, which provides future generations with better living surroundings and less survival stress.

For instance

, more lands maintained for human settlement with a slowed rise in sea level and less extreme weather due to mitigatory

climate

change

can be

Correct article usage

the results

show examples

results

Fix the agreement mistake

result

show examples

of present conservation approaches, despite the cost of human progress. In conclusion, even though thoroughly stopping

climate

change

seems to be beneficial in the long term, we can not ignore the limitation of the current situation and its significant hindrance to economic prosperity, so I reckon that it is better to live with

climate

change

.