Some people think that mobile phones should be banned in public places like libraries, shops and on public transport. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is said that our present-day world has descended into an industry-4.0 society. A school of thought holds that public places

such

as libraries, shops and public transport ought to have a prohibition against cell

phones

while there lies more compelling evidence that

this

rule would be unnecessary. Personally, I am in favour of the

second

idea. On the one hand, it is widely believed that the message sounds or music being played from

Correct your spelling

smartphones

show examples

smart

Correct your spelling

smartphones

show examples

phones

might bother many people around. To illustrate, libraries are where students and bookworms stay for hours doing piles of work or focusing on papers so that just a small sound would make them uncomfortable.

Additionally

,it is evident that customers at shops or busses usually forget their own things and

this

leads to losses of

phones

.

However

, the responsibility belongs to individuals and the solution could be having reminders

on

Change preposition

in

show examples

those places to raise people’s awareness.

On the other hand

, I side with those who advocate that there is no need to limit phone’s use on people in public accommodations.

First

of all, a mobile phone in

this

day and age is nothing but everyone’s most essential belonging owing to its helpfulness. To be more specific, students use

phones

to look up words or references for the purpose of studying.

Besides

, people waiting for hours on busses or trains need their

phones

for entertainment. Most importantly, a phone is used for urgent cases

such

as informing accidents or contacting police for help. In short, I believe that the benefits outweigh the drawbacks.

Thus

, I claim that in no circumstances should residents be prevented from using digital devices in public areas.