Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid.  To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Many people argue that well-developed countries should support underdeveloped cities by giving different types of support since simply giving money does not solve anything. In

this

essay, I will give out a few reasons to explain why I agree with

this

opinion. One rationale of offering developing communities other forms of assistance

instead

of

fund

Add an article

the fund

show examples

is that giving cash is a short term solution. It is obvious that authorities demand a huge amount of money to invest in one large scale project

such

as upgrading the transport systems or building schools or hospitals. As a consequence, the financial aid, which is given at that moment, can only be able to make effort in one project.

This

also

means that since dealing with poverty is costly for a long period, and by donating cash in that way,

this

problem will never be solved.

However

, there are different solutions, which is more practical, that rich regions are able to operate so as to help reducing poverty in poorer nations. Developed governments should come up with long term practices,

for example

, generate job opportunities or create chances for commercial coordination between two regions.

In particular

, in labour exportation, well-developed cities can deal with the developing countries to send workers to work in physical and low-income positions while providing them with housing and other basic fees. In conclusion,

although

offering financial aids can, at some point, help underdeveloped nations in solving their problems about poverty, there are more practical methods in doing it. In the future, with the opportunities, given to the

third

world, the starvation and unemployment issues can no longer be available