The government should ban smoking in all public places, even though this would restrict some other people's freedoms. Do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer.

In most cases,

people

who smoke tend to do it in any public space available. Even though banning

of

Change preposition

apply

show examples

smoking in these areas limits

freedoms

Correct article usage

the freedoms

show examples

of others, I do believe that the government should ban

for

Correct pronoun usage

it for

show examples

two reasons:

health

and environmental concerns. One of the

first

reasons why smoking should be restricted is that it affects not only the

health

of individual smokers but

also

people

within that surrounding. There are so many diseases associated with smoking habits. Innocent

people

who inhale smoke might end up being sick,

for example

, they could be affected by heart diseases and cancer.

In addition

to

health

problems, it will

also

cause environmental issues.

Besides

air pollution,

this

habit of smoking in public areas causes land pollution,

hence

making these places not so nice for relaxing or hanging out with friends and family. Most smokers tend not to take care of the environment, so they throw away leftovers in the wrong places. I do not,

however

, disagree with the statement because public spaces like squares, parks, and arboretums are supposed to be where

people

or residents within a particular city, town, or neighbourhood spend their free time. They can participate in various recreational activities,

for instance

, playing soccer, jogging or running.

Therefore

, these places should be protected at all

cost

Fix the agreement mistake

costs

show examples

. In summary, smoking should be severely restricted in public areas because it poses risk to the

health

of

people

and

pollute

Change the verb form

pollutes

show examples

the environment. In fact, offenders should be punished or fined by responsible authorities when they are found guilty.