Some people think that the best way to reduce the time spent in travelling to work is to replace parks and gardens close to the city center with apartment buildings for commuters, but others disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Numerous employees now face lengthy commutes to

work

. To address

this

situation, some propose building worker apartments on the sites of

parks

and

gardens

near the

city

center

Change the spelling

centre

show examples

, while others disagree. I believe that

parks

and

gardens

should not be demolished and that more effective solutions should be sought. There are compelling reasons to eschew

parks

and

gardens

in

favor

Change the spelling

favour

show examples

of apartment buildings. At the moment, many people must travel long distances to

work

, which is inconvenient and exhausting.

For example

, in Vietnam, some residents are unable to find decent

work

in their hometowns and are forced to

work

in larger cities.

As a result

, these

individuals

are forced to spend hours each day commuting to

work

.

As a result

,

parks

and

gardens

near the

city

center

Change the spelling

centre

show examples

that contribute nothing to improving the situation should be replaced with housing blocks for workers.

This

way,

individuals

can save considerable time, as most workplaces are located in the

city

center

Change the spelling

centre

show examples

.

However

, many believe that

this

strategy has flaws. They argue that

parks

and

gardens

are critical components of cities because they provide opportunities for citizens to unwind and exercise.

For instance

, people frequently picnic in

parks

on weekends.

Additionally

, constructing commuter blocks in the

city

center

Change the spelling

centre

show examples

is likely to result in an imbalance in population distribution. There may be too many residents in one area, while others retain plenty of open space. Both perspectives make compelling arguments, but I believe that building apartments for workers

instead

of

parks

and

gardens

is not the optimal solution. If

individuals

wish to reduce the amount of time spent

traveling

Change the spelling

travelling

show examples

to

work

, they can avoid rush hours. Companies could

also

provide quick and convenient transportation for their employees, as many do now in Vietnam with private buses. While replacing

parks

and

gardens

near the

city

center

Change the spelling

centre

show examples

with commuter apartments may save commuters some time, I believe

this

method has far too many drawbacks.

Individuals

can opt for simpler yet more effective alternatives.