Some people think that keeping pets is good for children while others think it is dangerous and unhealthy. Which opinion do you agree with? Discuss both options and give examples.

In recent times, pet-related injuries and mortalities have sparked heated debates about whether it is healthy for adolescents to be around

pets

. In

this

,

Add an article

an

the

show examples

essay I shall argue that

such

dangers are overemphasised and that juveniles receive substantive psychological benefits through having

pets

.

To begin

with,

although

exotic

pets

(e.g. snakes, spiders, apes, etc.) have been known to occasionally hurt and even kill teenagers,

such

incidents are so statistically rare as to be negligible.

This

is because the overwhelming majority of youth have non-lethal cats, dogs, fish, rodents and rabbits for

pets

. For ,example The Child Safety Institute found that over 90% of youngsters owned the aforementioned

pets

, and professed that they had never felt in the least bit endangered by them. Seen in

this

light, it is clearly unfounded to claim that

pets

present any physical danger to offspring.

Secondly

,

pets

can impact positively child psychology.

This

is because young pet owners frequently empathise with their

pets

and perform a diverse range of actions to maintain they are well being (e.g. feeding, grooming, administering medicine, etc).

For example

, the Cambridge Developmental Psychology Unit found that toddlers who had grown up with

pets

were 30% less likely to bully others and resolve conflicts through aggression.

Consequently

, it is undeniable that a child’s pro-sociality and mental health can be improved through exposure to

pets

. In conclusion, the cited evidence provides strong support for the view that kids owning

pets

is a good thing. In the future, as more laws are introduced to ban the ownership of illegally acquired exotic

pets

,

this

viewpoint will no doubt surge in popularity.