Some people think that in order to deal with the problem of congestion in cities, privately owned vehicles should be banned in the city centers while others consider this to be an unrealistic solution. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In modern society, the proliferation of private
cars
has put a strain on the transport
system and caused traffic
congestion. It is often said that introducing restrictions to prohibit car ownership in the city centre is one of the effective methods to alleviate these problems. Meanwhile
some people consider Add a comma
Meanwhile,
this
to be impossible to do. Personally, I believe that privately owned vehicles should be banned to drive an efficient transport
system.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that the swelling of cars
has taken its toll on traffic
problems. That could be explained by the fact that in some metropolis cities where there is a large population, the quantity of cars
increases
more than ever before, which makes up a lot of land to park. Wrong verb form
has increased
Hence
, car ownerships should stop working in urban areas and this
is a possible approach to do
in recent days as a number of big cities from around the world are Verb problem
apply
implicating
Verb problem
implementing
this
solution. Take Amsterdam for a good example, almost all citizens commute to work by bicycles
, which would reduce gridlock congestion to 28% in 2019 in comparison to 40% in 2018. Fix the agreement mistake
bicycle
As a result
, when the national government restricts the volume of private vehicles, it will curb traffic
issues and reduce air pollution.
On the other hand
Add a comma
hand,
cars
are not the principal factors that contribute to traffic
congestion in current days. People need to take into consideration some external factors such
as public awareness and the quality of infrastructure. It is true that,
many city dwellers suffer from inadequate Remove the comma
apply
transport
infrastructure along with
dense transport
density which could lead to stuck in traffic
jams at peak hours. Furthermore
, irresponsible driving habits would trigger this
obstacle. That's why according to
an article published in the journal The New York Times, the proportion of global car accidents increased to 62%, compared with 50% in 2018. Consequently
, it is understandable that the public considers the aforementioned method to be unrealistic because cars
have not contributed to key reasons.
In conclusion, although
people have widely different views on this
adverse trend, I believe that banning cars
could facilitate
residents Verb problem
help
to
deal with movement difficulties. In the future, I predict that there will be a considerable decrease in the figure for Fix the infinitive
apply
cars
in inner cities.Submitted by ngocmai07112000 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
coherence and cohesion
Ensure that the introduction and conclusion directly relate to the topic of the essay. Try to provide more specific examples to support your arguments.
task achievement
You have addressed the task by discussing both views and giving your opinion. Make sure to provide a clearer stance in your introduction.