Some people think that in order to deal with the problem of congestion in cities, privately owned vehicles should be banned in the city centers while others consider this to be an unrealistic solution. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

In modern society, the proliferation of private
cars
has put a strain on the
transport
system and caused
traffic
congestion. It is often said that introducing restrictions to prohibit car ownership in the city centre is one of the effective methods to alleviate these problems.
Meanwhile
Add a comma
Meanwhile,
show examples
some people consider
this
to be impossible to do. Personally, I believe that privately owned vehicles should be banned to drive an efficient
transport
system. On the one hand, it is undeniable that the swelling of
cars
has taken its toll on
traffic
problems. That could be explained by the fact that in some metropolis cities where there is a large population, the quantity of
cars
increases
Wrong verb form
has increased
show examples
more than ever before, which makes up a lot of land to park.
Hence
, car ownerships should stop working in urban areas and
this
is a possible approach
to do
Verb problem
apply
show examples
in recent days as a number of big cities from around the world are
implicating
Verb problem
implementing
show examples
this
solution. Take Amsterdam for a good example, almost all citizens commute to work by
bicycles
Fix the agreement mistake
bicycle
show examples
, which would reduce gridlock congestion to 28% in 2019 in comparison to 40% in 2018.
As a result
, when the national government restricts the volume of private vehicles, it will curb
traffic
issues and reduce air pollution. On the other
hand
Add a comma
hand,
show examples
cars
are not the principal factors that contribute to
traffic
congestion in current days. People need to take into consideration some external factors
such
as public awareness and the quality of infrastructure. It is true that
,
Remove the comma
apply
show examples
many city dwellers suffer from inadequate
transport
infrastructure
along with
dense
transport
density which could lead to stuck in
traffic
jams at peak hours.
Furthermore
, irresponsible driving habits would trigger
this
obstacle. That's why
according to
an article published in the journal The New York Times, the proportion of global car accidents increased to 62%, compared with 50% in 2018.
Consequently
, it is understandable that the public considers the aforementioned method to be unrealistic because
cars
have not contributed to key reasons. In conclusion,
although
people have widely different views on
this
adverse trend, I believe that banning
cars
could
facilitate
Verb problem
help
show examples
residents
to
Fix the infinitive
apply
show examples
deal with movement difficulties. In the future, I predict that there will be a considerable decrease in the figure for
cars
in inner cities.
Submitted by ngocmai07112000 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

coherence and cohesion
Ensure that the introduction and conclusion directly relate to the topic of the essay. Try to provide more specific examples to support your arguments.
task achievement
You have addressed the task by discussing both views and giving your opinion. Make sure to provide a clearer stance in your introduction.
Topic Vocabulary:
  • congestion
  • privately owned vehicles
  • ban
  • city centers
  • traffic congestion
  • air pollution
  • noise levels
  • urban environment
  • public transport
  • environmentally friendly
  • healthier lifestyle
  • commuting
  • congestion charges
  • peak times
  • environment-friendly vehicles
What to do next:
Look at other essays: