Modern societies need specialists in certain fields, but not others Some people therefore think that governments should pay university fees for students who study subject that are needed by society. Those who choose to study less relevant subjects should not receive government funding. Would the advantages of such an educational policy outweigh the disadvantages?

At present, there are many people who suggest that the governments should provide funding for students who study

subjects

that are essential for society. I totally contradict

this

practice as there are more disadvantages than advantages.

Firstly

, providing support for some particular

fields

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

can lead to an excessive workforce in certain

subjects

;

therefore

, the competitiveness of job-seeking will dramatically increase.

For example

, the fresh graduate student will face a hard time in finding a job as there are others who study in the same

fields

. As the result,

this

policy can rise up the unemployment rate which the governments

also

have to solve

this

issue.

Therefore

,

this

policy is unsustainable and could be the cause of other issues. 

However

, many people insist that the government should provide support to the relevant

fields

in order to increase the population of specialists in specific

subjects

.

Moreover

, they explain that

this

practice can contribute positive outcomes to societies. I totally disagree with

this

statement as it is unfair to justify which

subjects

are the certain

fields

. To support my idea, every field has its own particular significance which can contribute to a positive impact on societies.

For instance

, the field of Dramatic Arts, which some consider as insignificant

subjects

, is the fundamental study of human thought and behaviour which can be applied to many other concepts.

Moreover

, the theatre performance is the method to reflect social issues to the societies which can help to find a solution.  In conclusion, the disadvantages of

this

policy outweigh the advantages. The main reasons are it will lead to the unemployment problem and it is not able to underestimate any

subjects

because every subject has played a crucial role in society.