Throughout the history of science, it has been a controversial question that nature or nurture is more important in human 
behavioralChange the spelling
show examples
  and psychological development. Scientists have been conflicting about the effects of genetics and the environment on human beings for years. Some 
 consider that talents in 
 and 
 are down to a child’s natural ability, whereas others believe that any person can become good at 
 or 
 through 
. In my opinion, both genetic factors and 
 have a great impact on success. On the one hand, genetic predisposition will be useless in situations where there is a lack of teaching, guidance, and practice. 
, if a sportsperson or musician wants to perform at high levels, they should have appropriate genes for the field which is belonging. 
If you want a baby to talk, you 
 must teach the words. 
, you 
 must teach someone how to run and kick the ball, 
 he is able to play football. 
 plays a significant role in getting 
 to access knowledge to do something they want to specialize in. It gives them not only the required information but 
 instructs them how to repetitive practice properly which has an influence on gaining experience essential to become an expert. 
, taking 
 makes discovering the potential for professional skills possible. 
, children who have long and flexible fingers will not be good musicians, if they do not have an opportunity for piano tuition. 
, when they take a 
 course and have a chance to play 
pianoChange the article
show examples
 , they might realize their ability. 
In terms of talent 
 being called gifted, some 
 believe that God has gifted talented one’s abilities to him. Scientifically, talented 
’s gene codes are identified in the womb. 
, innate capacity is as important as training for developmental outcomes in 
 or 
. Especially in elite 
 levels, initial conditions defined in our genes which are having a proper height or weight, flexibility, muscle distribution, intelligence, gender, and hereditary background make a difference. According to some research, genetically non-advantageous 
 are not more successful than advantageous ones even if they put in the same effort. Take an example, both two gymnasts who have flexible and strong muscles do exactly the same exercises that their coach thought. While one of them can do difficult motions or shows movements more aesthetically and straight, 
 win the Olympic medal, the other who does not have lucky genes and ancestors can not. 
In conclusion, the 
 process is as considerable as genetic factors to reveal a talent for 
 or 
. 
 can develop themselves with practice, but learnable skills are limited. The innate potential is necessary to become a good 
 person or musician.