Rich countries should not give jobs to skilled workers (for example doctors and engineers )of poor countries as they are needed their home country more than the rich countries. How far do you agree or disagree with the statement given?

Nowadays, a plethora of individuals are migrating to foreign

countries

in search of better opportunities and it is not a new phenomenon.A chunk of individuals opines that

this

trend will be detrimental for the economy of the

country

whilst others are sceptical about it. I;

however

believe that it has both pros and cons and we need to delve into both sides before forming any opinions.

To begin

with, developed

countries

get immense benefits by offering jobs to skilled

workers

outside their

country

.

Firstly

, rich

countries

have complicated modern economies, which required skilled and experienced

workers

for the efficient operation of the

country

.

Secondly

, the corporations employ people from underdeveloped

countries

so they can reduce the expenditure of the organisation as they pay them less compared to their native

workers

.

For instance

, hourly wages are fixed by developed

countries

therefore

they cannot pay less than minimum wage which is mandatory by the authorities.

On the other hand

, the situation is indeed harmful to develop

countries

as they spend enormous money to educate and generate productive labour so they can support their

countries

economies.

For instance

, it is estimated that India spends billions of dollars on tertiary education but when the time comes to serve the

country

they migrate to a foreign land.

This

process is called brain drain.

Thus

it increases the wealth gap between

countries

. In conclusion, it is true that skilled

workers

need everywhere. I feel they are needed more in their home

countries

because they should pay back to their motherland by living there and serving their community. Henceforth, which

country

should limit the number of foreign field

workers

.