Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The excessive use of fossil fuel in vehicles has come under fire for the past few years for its major effect on the atmosphere.

Therefore

Linking Words

, people have widely differing views about whether the government should impose a tax on petrol or not. On the one hand, there are multiple reasons why raising the crude oil cost is a valid argument. Raising the price of crude oil is going to curtail the number of drivers using vehicles

such

Linking Words

as private cars and motorbikes as money is often a big motivation.

Thus

Linking Words

, it is apparent that people now have to focus on finding new environmental-friendly resources or renewable ones. There is mounting evidence that with fewer people owning personal cars, the authority needs to take more proactive action to widen the choices of public transports. Without fumes from

automobile

Fix the agreement mistake

automobiles

show examples

or traffic congestions, the environment is clearer and

this

Linking Words

can tremendously reduce public health hazards.

On the other hand

Linking Words

, others are of the opinion that the potency of

this

Linking Words

measure can be overweighed by 3 counter-arguments. The taxes will not discourage affluent consumers from buying new cars. A tax on petrol is just a tax on the poor, which can result in them having less money for non-resource purchases. A more feasible approach would be that the authority finds a new way to integrate alternative renewable resources into residents' lives or raise the citizens' awareness when it comes to traffic hold-up issues. All things considered, even though raising the price of crude oil brings certain benefits, it is generally the case that it will, in turn, be out of favour with many segments of the population.