Human activity has had a negative impact on plants and animals around the world. Some people think that this cannot be changed, while others believe actions can be taken to bring about a change.

Recent research revealed significant harm caused to plants and animals around the world. Once a part of society claims that
this
question can’t be solved in any way, another part promotes some methods to correct the situation. I personally agree with the optimistic part of humanity and believe that the negative impact could be reduced. Some global progress activists state that it's impossible to roll back changes and shout on every corner that they are not ready to live without big cars and in less tech comfort,
however
manufacturing or building industries can’t be more ecological without losing effectiveness. Mankind is the king of all animals, who are easily slaughtering pure souls for their needs. In most cases,
this
position stems from their hyper ego and inability to think with warm feelings and kindness about fellowmen and environmental health on
this
planet.
For example
, recently a lot of news agencies have written about building a new factory complex in the northwest area of the country.
Although
a lot of activists protested against
this
project, as soon as business companies paid the required sums to certain people, the construction work started with public comments that
this
project matches all eco-standards, while that’s obviously not true.
On the contrary
, others believe that everything is possible and some countries already show how to develop city areas with a unique integration of nature and human habitation, preserving forests and rare breeds of birds and animals. It looks like there is still a significant amount of people who could just think about others in the
first
place. These initiatives are widely spread in Scandinavian countries. Helsinki is a well-known winner in the area of integrating city transport systems and nature, so you can see rabbits and hedgehogs, not only in suburbs but
also
on central streets. And Ikea from Sweden claims that they produce all their products with an abundant amount of recycled components and involving green technology. I think that our planet could be easily saved with a wide biosphere for future generations if everyone would start to think about others before themselves. In summary, with
this
action, one can change the negative impact humans have had on the planet.
Submitted by casualuser on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Your opinion

Don’t put your opinion unless you are asked to give it.

If the question asks what you think, you MUST give your opinion to get a good score.

Don’t leave your opinion until the conclusion.

Here are examples of instructions that require you to give your opinion:

...do you agree or disagree?...do you think...?...your opinion...?

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • negative impact
  • extinct
  • deforestation
  • pollution
  • habitat destruction
  • mitigate
  • reverse
  • stricter regulations
  • protected areas
  • endangered species
  • education and awareness campaigns
  • biodiversity
  • consequences
  • renewable energy sources
  • organic farming
  • eco-tourism
  • environmental regulations
  • sustainable practices
  • natural ecosystems
  • preserve biodiversity
What to do next:
Look at other essays: