under British and Australian laws a jury is a criminal case has no access to information about the defendant's past criminal record. This protects the person who is being accused of the crime some lawyers have suggested that this practice should be changed and that a jury should be given all the past facts before they reach their decision about the case do you agree or disagree ? Give reason for your answer

It is debatable whether the

jury

had access to the accused's past criminal information.

While

some may think that past records can provide additional details, others believe that it is very detrimental to the accused person. Personally, I may disagree with the above statement.

such

statements because I tend to believe that the old activities have no right to engage in

today

Change noun form

today's

show examples

case. Despite the fact that people can change and grow after what they've been through, apparently

Add a comma

,

show examples

society still tends to judge people by relating their past characters easily. What's more wiser by any chance to only weigh the current facts and evidence as the previous facts had already passed. As an illustration, the

jury

might accuse the wrong person because someone has a bad criminal

report

Correct your spelling

record

show examples

. So, for

me

Add a comma

me,

show examples

it's fair to exclude the previous reports.

On the other hand

, another opinion to consider is that repeated bad

behavior

Change the spelling

behaviour

show examples

should be punished tougher than the first.

Consequently

, in

this

case, the

jury

needs to find out if someone has done something similar actions in the past.

However

, given these circumstances for me, it is better not to imply

this

belief. As previously stated, I am deeply concerned that a decision may be invalid if the

jury

has previous files.

To conclude

, what British and Australian laws have done to hide the facts previously sounds appropriate to

I

Change the pronoun

me

show examples

. A justifiable judgment can be made if only the

jury

excludes the defendant's past record.