The force of inertia affects all matters including us equally. But what makes some
willfully bring or accept
, while others don't? Change for most
and in most cases is a choice, which requires
to act on it.
,
can bring positive and negative consequences to
’s life depending on personal preferences. In
I would like to argue that neither positive nor negative results are guaranteed.
, the results of a change can vary from
person to another depending on the circumstances.
Avoiding or eluding
does not necessarily mean passivity;
, it can mean stability and security for some
.
who avoid
are those who usually prefer stability and security over adventure. There are plenty of logical reasons behind why avoiding
can bring assurance. The
reason is that by avoiding
,
can increase their chance of success and eliminate possible risks. And staying in
state or position means more competence in that area due to repetition, which makes us more efficient and competent.
could receive multiple promotions within the same organization, while they might lose the chance if they changed their workplace frequently. The same pattern applies to relationships.
, those who appreciate family values and bonds mostly prefer not to leave their home city or country, fearing disconnection with their family.
, the number of drawbacks to stabilization
is as large as the benefits.
,
most
are not risk-free, many
are willing to welcome
.
group of
cherishes adventure and
alongside accepting risks.
who take risks and still appreciate
are optimistic and aware of the opportunities that may come with
. For someone who has an adventurous personality, staying in a place for an extended period can be depressive and suffocating.
, they are willing to trade job promotions off with adventure and new jobs.
an attitude toward
used to be not quite acceptable, as an instance, many successful businessmen and women are leaving cities for the countryside in the quest to break free from their hectic city lifestyle.
new worldview and mindset make life more bearable for those who seek excitement.
, as mentioned earlier,
can be beneficial or harmful depending upon the person who acts on
and the circumstances.
In conclusion, the core of the argument suggests that there is no definitive and absolute answer to the question of whether we should welcome
or treat them stagnantly.
, there is no good or harm in the
, but it is a choice made by different
. Being open to change might be beneficial to someone, while it can harm someone else.
Excellent job.
of the best essays you’ve written. It is much more coherent and much more focused than most of your other essays. There is still room for improvement, of course, and I have highlighted some of the
you can make to refine your essay even
. But you’re getting better and better at
by the day, so don’t stop writing. Two thumbs up!