In many cities the use of video cameras in public places is being is being increased in order to reduce crime, but some people believe that these measures restrict our individual freedom. Do the benefits of increased security outweigh the drawbacks?

Nowadays, with
Add an article
the rise
a rise
show examples
rise
Change the verb form
rising
show examples
in the rate of crime, authorities are lying emphases on installing
video
cameras
at places of public interest to ensure safety in society.
Video
surveillance has gained immense popularity in a number of cities in recent years. While critics may consider
in
Correct your spelling
it
show examples
an invasion of public privacy, I believe that the benefits prevail over the drawbacks. There are two main reasons why a section of society might disapprove of the use of
video
cameras
in public places. The
first
objection is that we are constantly monitored by the authorities or by private security firms. Many people find
this
intrusive and feel that the recording of their movements is a form of state control that curtails their individual freedom. The
second
argument against the installation of CCTV
cameras
is that they are being used as an alternative to police officers patrolling the streets , which is unlikely to make members of the public feel safer. Despite the hazards mentioned above, I believe the use of
video
cameras
to monitor public areas has numerous merits. The key objective of
video
surveillance is to deter criminals and to prevent crime. Petty crimes like shoplifting and
pick pocketing
Correct your spelling
pickpocketing
show examples
are less likely to occur under surveillance
cameras
. Whenever someone commits a crime, the police can use the
video
evidence to catch and prosecute offenders.
Thus
,
video
cameras
offer valuable support to police officers
,
Remove the comma
apply
show examples
and make cities safer for the inhabitants and visitors alike. In conclusion, I believe that we gain more than we lose from the enhanced security that CCTV
cameras
bring to our lives and transform society into an ideal one .
Therefore
, a wise decision would be to reconcile the interest in individual liberty with the interest in effective law enforcement.
Submitted by prabhjotkaur9520 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: