Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favour of them because of their benefits to humanity. Discuss both views and give your own opinion

Almost all goods pass through stages of consideration as well as through

experiments

in way of starting massive manufacturing of these products. To determine risks for society scholars conduct

experiments

with humans genetic-similar

animals

. The community thinks that

such

kinds of

experiments

are vulgar toward

animals

and out of the law, whereas others agree that human life

are

Change the verb form

is

show examples

much more important and all lost to justify the bill. Subjectively I tend to believe the community should not wonder about

this

in fact of their lack of knowledge, so clinic

experiments

are necessary to be confident about using any product. A lot of

animals

are murdered in

experiments

related to testing the effectiveness of products, but current technologies allow us to set up

experiments

without

animals

. The contemporary devices are able to create simulations of person organisms in a digital format, so testing some injections might be conducted in computer-based processes. Even though

experiments

with animal`s participation a more effective, the likelihood of success is not a 100-per cent. It is impossible to be sure about the exploration of products without awareness of risks for health.

For instance

, rats and monkeys are similar to people in some aspects, so visible impact on

animals

would be shown immediately and cannot be represented with computers. In fact, the issue of conducting

experiments

is closely related to the issue of modern medicine. Some of the drugs are produced only with some parts of

animals

.

For example

, vaccines