Climate change is a big environmental problem that has become critical in last couple of decades. Some people claim that humans should stop burning fossil fuels and use only alternative energy resources, such as wind and solar power. Others say that oil, gas and coal are essential for many industries, and not using them will lead to economic collapse. What is your opinion? Support your point of view with relevant examples.

It is considered that in the

last

few decades climate change has become a hazardous world issue. Some people think that humanity

instead

of burning natural

resources

have to use alternative

energy

resources

which include the power of wind and solar, while others claim that coal, gas and oil are the main industrial fuels,

therefore

, not using them will result in a global economic problem. In my view, many factories can start to use atomic

energy

.

In addition

, burning fossil fuels can be replaced by using

electicity

Correct your spelling

electricity

. As for applying nuclear

energy

in the industrial field,

this

type of

energy

has more coefficient of productivity and it is less harmful.

In other words

, using atomic

energy

enables people to decrease any type of pollution.

For instance

, a few factories will stop polluting the air by evaporating toxic chemical compounds in the atmosphere.

In contrast

with natural

resources

such

as wind and solar, nuclear

energy

is more effective because

this

type of

energy

was discovered no more than 150 years ago.

Thus

, atomic

resources

are the more suitable way to provide factories with

energy

.

Furthermore

, many modern machines are based on oil engines which can be replaced by electrical technologies. Electricity has a high level of purity that. To conclude, nowadays, there are well-developed technologies

such

as atomic

energy

and electricity which do not have a harmful influence on the environment.