In same cities, governments have tried to reduce traffic. For instance, they impose tax during rush hour. Do you think this development is positive or negative?

Nowadays, authorities are embarking on taking jam tax policies to alleviate the traffic jam in certain urban areas, at the same time ,
however
, there is some uncertainty as to the merits and demerits about
this
issue. In
this
essay , I will review both sides of the debate to seek a conclusion.
To begin
with, there is no doubt that charging a congestion tax allows people take more concentrate on
this
problem and motivate them to seek alternative ways to commute,
such
as carpool or taking public transport.
Moreover
, It is a feasible measure to serve to maintain a positive cycle of the environment.
This
is because extra expense can make it possible to reduce the number of cars at the peak hour, meanwhile controlling the emission of fuel fossils to some extent, thereby protecting the sustainability of our environment.
Furthermore
, the government can increase the tax, which in turn could financial education and infrastructure.
On the other hand
,
however
, some drivers with extra expense can make it burden more pressure if they are incapable to find a substitute manner to go to a destination.
In addition
, it would be a hardship for the rich to make their accustomed lifestyles give way to the levy due to the fact that they are not fearful of economic pressure, which could accelerate the inequality of society.
Consequently
, it would be impossible to eradicate the root cause of the traffic jam by means of the levy. To summarize, there is no denying that being a relatively efficient way, paying for expenses invokes individuals’ responsibilities of building an environmentally friendly society, which truly reduces the road congestion in the peak hour.
On the other hand
, it is obvious that
this
method could merely take more force on ordinary people ,and those who have more wealth can be less affected, which may lead to some social problems. In the final analysis,
therefore
, one can conclude that the levy policy can be positive progress. Meanwhile, the government should do more investigation and propose comprehensive approaches to improve the law up-to-date,
as a result
, benefiting citizens and society.
Submitted by liqinan158 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • imposition
  • rush-hour tax
  • road congestion
  • sustainable urban environment
  • public transportation infrastructure
  • disproportionately affect
  • flexible work hours
  • alternative transportation options
  • displacing the traffic problem
  • effectiveness
  • psychological
  • societal impacts
  • cultural attitudes
  • commuting
  • remote work
  • staggered work hours
  • quality of life
  • commute times
  • work-life balance
  • unintended consequences
  • isolation
  • collaboration
  • team dynamics
  • urban mobility
What to do next:
Look at other essays: