Following the Great Resignation, the job market is hot. Should workers constantly keep a wandering eye for their next opportunity, even if they’re not necessarily itching to leave?

n the past six months,
Beth
has increased her salary by nearly £10,000. She has gradually negotiated her way from full-time office hours to a permanent remote-working contract. Her day-to-day opportunities have swelled. Compared to the start of the year, she has struck a better
work
-life balance. And she’s done it with practically zero haggling or demands.
Instead
, her career upgrade has been achieved by swiftly changing
jobs
. “Whenever I’ve felt as though the
role
hasn’t been exactly as promised, I’ve looked for the
next
opportunity
,” explains
Beth
. “If
it’s
something that’s closer to my ideal
work
set-up, a company that looks appealing,
then
I apply.” Based in Yorkshire, UK,
Beth
is soon
to begin
her
third
account-manager
role
this
year. She says she’s only been able to
finally
command a fair wage and flexible working by adopting
this
job
-seeking mindset. “Unfortunately, my experience is that I’ll only receive a pay rise if I go to my boss with another
job
offer,” adds
Beth
. “My end goal has always been remote working. It felt unachievable – until I found my new
role
.” Since the start of the pandemic, swathes of
workers
across industries have left their
jobs
– and millions more are contemplating quitting, too.
It’s
helping to cause a worldwide hiring crisis.
However
,
it’s
not just recent
vacancies
companies are struggling to fill. As many global economies are growing, businesses are struggling to keep up as they expand. The demand for talent is,
therefore
, skyrocketing.
It’s
created a sellers’ market:
workers
have more leverage than ever, and many can afford to cherry pick a
role
that aligns more with their values and desires. Rather than begin searching for a new position when they’re unhappy or burned out – typically years into a
role
– some
workers
are opting to seek a better
opportunity
from day one.
This
mindset is a kind of ‘Great Flirtation’ with new
jobs
: a constantly wandering eye to other openings, regardless of how long a worker has been in a
role
, and how content they are in their current
job
. In a labour market that favours
workers
, is constantly flirting with other openings the right approach to help
workers
stay happy, get into better positions – or even achieve more in their career? ‘Irrational, aimless wandering’ For decades, the prevailing narrative has been to stay in a
role
for as long as possible, build résumé clout and make a lasting contribution to an organisation. Prematurely switching
roles
was stigmatised as ‘
job
hopping’ – not just by bosses, but
also
wider society. In 1974, American industrial psychologist Edwin Ghiselli likened it to vagrancy, coining the term ‘Hobo Syndrome’ to describe
workers
who frequently changed
roles
. His approach essentially re-framed the complexities of frequent quitting to irrational, aimless wandering – driven by internal impulses absent from “organised or logical thought”.
Workers
can take advantage of the current labour shortage and secure their dream
role
– Simon
Wingate
In
this
framework, employers held power over employees, which kept them in their
roles
. “The idea was if the employer takes care of you, you do the same and stick with them,” explains Mark Bolino, director of management and international business at the University of Oklahoma, US. The global recession of the 1980s shook loose some of
this
thinking. As companies had to cut costs, they laid off
workers
, says Bolino, whose research has focused on employees’ dedication to their organisations and why they quit.
Instead
of employers expecting
workers
to stay in
roles
indefinitely, he says “the relationship
subsequently
became more transactional: ‘if we have layoffs, we have them. If you find a better
job
opportunity
, we understand’.” Rather than climbing a career ladder with one company,
then
, the onus fell to the employee to forge their own path. Yet, ‘sticking’ at a
job
for the long-term was ingrained. According to data from the US Bureau of Labor Statistics, American
workers
’ median
job
tenure steadily rose from 3.5 years in the 1980s to 4.4 years in the 2000s, before slightly dipping at the end of the past decade. Looking for the
next
opportunity
has, typically, been a reactive process. Often,
it’s
to the employee’s detriment: waiting until frustration, a lack of progression or workplace conflict kicks in before bailing. But the pandemic seems to have changed
this
thinking; as
workers
report long stretches of stress and introspection, many are re-evaluating their lives and careers – and are more open to making moves.
Workers
have begun looking for
jobs
that better match the
work
set-ups they want – particularly the option for remote- and flexible
work
. “In August, we found that the
number
of applications for
jobs
with remote working outpaced the
number
of
vacancies
offering a hybrid
work
set-up,” says Simon
Wingate
, managing director at UK recruitment firm Reed.
However
,
job
adverts have continued in their droves.
Wingate
says 120,000
vacancies
were added to Reed in the
first
10 days of November, meaning
it’s
on track to have its highest
number
of monthly postings since 2008. A higher
number
of
vacancies
, coupled with an increase in employers offering better options to fill those
roles
, has created an embarrassment of riches for new
job
options. “
Workers
can take advantage of the current labour shortage and secure their dream
role
,” adds
Wingate
.
Furthermore
, employees can seek
job
opportunities, even if they’re not necessarily itching to leave their company immediately, and leverage the hot
job
market to their advantage.
This
is particularly the case as companies create remote-
first
roles
, opening access to thousands of new
roles
for millions of
workers
once geographically excluded. “The power is currently in the workforce’s hands, meaning they can make more demands – including a higher wage, more perks and flexible working arrangements,” says
Wingate
.
Submitted by francodavisp on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: