Some people think that traditional games are better than modern games in helping children develop their abilities. To what extent do you agree?

There is

such

a deep discussion reloving around society whether modern

games

can create better opportunities for children to carry

further

their abilities or does it keep them away from developing their skills. Traditional

games

such

as backgammon and chess have always been the most prominent

games

that humanity utilised. From my point of view, we should not sacrifice our cultural heritage for modern alternatives.

However

, both modern and traditional

games

do aid our youth to upgrade their mindsets. In our present-day society, there is

such

a considerable majority that believes traditional

games

have more benefits compared to modern ones. To specialise it more, cultural competitions

such

as chess have been present since Persian Empire, and it is proven that performing at chess transforms our way of thinking tremendously. Apart from that, it

also

prominently educates us about maintaining our patience.

Besides

, our youth would love to play their cultural

games

. On top of that, traditional

games

will add cultural satisfaction to our children and prevent them from losing their identity. There are

such

undebatable numbers that agree that new-age

games

are more stimulant at child skill development.

In other words

, some present-day

games

bolster memorising abilities. Having

this

said, they

also

add unique and extended experiences. From my perspective, affirmably, both authentic and modern

games

let us gaze through our thoughts.

Nevertheless

, traditional is more divine and sacred for me. In conclusion, people hold conflicting views about whether modern or authentic

games

are efficient. Aged

games

provide us be aware of our vulnerable history. When it comes to present ones, they greet us with new techniques and methods of playing. Whether new or old, I am convinced that both are beneficial for the youth.