Present a written argument or case to an educated reader with no specialist knowledge of the following topic. Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves? Use your own ideas, knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examples and with relevant evidence. You should write at least 250 words.

.In the modern era , the issue of helping one underpreveledge

state

has become highly controversial.Many people opine that the rich

state

should provide assistance to those countries who are not capable to infuse their basic requirements while others think

otherwise

.From my perspective ,every human has the right to get food ,shelter ,education,clothes, and medical facility,so to make a breakthrough change in the

world

it is the responsibility of the wealthy

states

to ensure at least these primary needs of the persons who are not able to get them.

This

essay will examine both sides of the argument and provide an overall opinion. Generally speaking, there are a number of reasons why people believe that the government should make sure the basic rights of a required

state

. Perhaps the main reason why people are in favour of

this

idea is that being economically strong if a nation does not help the poorer

state

,they will not thrive anymore.A good illustration of

this

is that to hold the higher position in the

world

market every richest

state

ought to compete with another,and without helping poorer

states

no nation could gain the capacity to do the race.

Furthermore

,another point in the favour of assistance to the lower economy

state

is that an ethical value will add to their revolution who is the richest

state

though they have many drawbacks.As a consequence , the

world

will know them through their humanity virtue

also

evaluate them for

this

particular reason. Despite these arguments , there has another case is that owing to solvency wealthy

states

may prefer to rule the poorer ones.

In addition

,they want to use the poorer as a slave .

As a result

, wealthy

states

provide the very basic needs

such

as food,clothes, and shelter only the poorer

state

,and they have been subjugated as they could not get any education . In conclusion, it must be said that the above-mentioned issue has become complex which has no easy solution .Despite these arguments, I feel that for being forwarded and to maintain ethical value every strong

state

should help the weaker ones. If any

state

could fulfil the requirements of other

states

, it will be able to resolve the main problem of the

world