Studying art in schools improves studrnt's performance in other subjects ,because it is easier for multi_skilled students to learn new things. That's why art should be obligatory in schools. Do you agree or disagree?

It is often said that studying and learning

art

in educational centres upgrades pupils' functioning in other

subjects

because it is more effortless for multi_skilld people to learn new items.

This

is a reason why

art

should be taught and compulsory. From my point of view ,I strongly agree with

this

idea I

also

believe that

this

should be increased.

Firstly

,one of the main reasons for

this

argument is the performance of

art

in the human brain.

For example

,some researchers and psychologists habitually opine when pupils commence their classes with different

subjects

of

art

such

as taking up a musical instrument ,they may become more motivated to study other difficult

subjects

such

as math

besides

science.

This

could boost their practice

also

,

this

aims students to learn things constructively and effortlessly.

Therefore

,

this

makes it clear why studying the craft improves students' performance in other stuff and why

this

should be compulsory.

Secondly

,another reason is ,we all know there is no denying that

art

is easier than others.

For instance

,the young generations are required to spend about two or three hours per day studying different

subjects

related to it.

This

definitely could create a preparedness to start learning other things for a long time that are exactly more difficult without feeling exhausted.

This

could create a noticeable speed to learn taugh items quickly.

As a result

,it becomes apparent there is a prominent reason behind each claim via societies about it. To summarise ,I strongly agree

art

should be studied.

Additionally

,the courses of the craft must be rose in schools. It is predicted that ,to continue

this

operation pupils will learn hard

subjects

effortlessly by receiving help from

art

in the near future.