Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are spoken by very small numbers of people. Some people say that governments should spend public money on saving these languages, while others believe that would be a waste of money. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.

Languages
are among the paramount inventions of humanity which made a milestone in the development of human civilization. By using it, humankind became able to transfer their feelings, problems, ideas and thoughts. People’s opinions differ as to whether it is necessary for the authorities to preserve minority
languages
from extinction by assigning public monetary budgets. While there are strong arguments against
this
sentiment, I strongly advocate the ones who agree with it. There are several reasons why some people opine that public money should not be spent on keeping ancient
languages
alive. There is mounting evidence that in the future, the number of
languages
will decrease due to high rates of immigration and a mixture of ethnicities as once called by Marshall McLuhan “The global village”. So it is a natural selection among the
languages
to either vanish or merge into other ones or persist.
For example
, the American Indian language went to extinction a few years ago by the death of the
last
man who completely understood it.
In contrast
to the above arguments, I strictly opt for the people who believe that all precious ancient
languages
should be saved by spending money from the national reserve. In my opinion, behind every single language lies a world of history, culture, tradition and heritage, albeit not spoken by many people. Keeping these valuable assets is the key to knowing about our roots, history and the path our ancestors passed to alter us into what we are today.
Furthermore
, diversity is absolute of the essence for mankind to develop in the future, and keeping
such
heritages is a solution to guarantee the diversity of races and cultures. To sum up,
although
governmental investments in saving the minority
languages
may bring about some hassles, I think their merits outweigh them by far. Governments should consider the fact that they are in charge of keeping the heritage behind
languages
by spending reasonable amounts of money.
Submitted by Serhii Baraniuk on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: