Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Infrastructure has always been allocated an adequate budget of a country to itself.
However
, spending more money on railways or roadways is an important decision
which
Correct word choice
that
show examples
a government should take. In my opinion, they should
trade-off
Correct your spelling
trade off
show examples
the expenditure between these two, though. On one hand, investment in the railways is beneficial
both
Change preposition
to both
show examples
on
Change preposition
apply
show examples
the
Correct article usage
apply
show examples
traffic congestion and
the
Correct article usage
apply
show examples
air quality simultaneous with a reduction in the use of fuels. The authorities could extend the routes with more destinations and encourage people to use trains
instead
of their own cars by giving a discount on the tickets,
for example
.
In other words
,
rail-lines
Correct your spelling
rail-line
show examples
improvement would be advantageous not only for the country but
also
for people by having more time for themselves rather than driving.
Although
, the roads should not be neglected at the same time.
On the other hand
, improving the lanes would result in more safety and fewer tragedies.
This
means all of the roads in a country should have the standard quality if the governments do not want to face some catastrophic accidents.
In addition
, it affects
the
Correct article usage
apply
show examples
public transport facilities
such
as buses and minibuses as well. After all, there are people who prefer to communicate by their own vehicle for different reasons.
For instance
, they may need to stop somewhere remote which is inaccessible for the trains or their destination is located between stations and so on, which leads the administrators to spend money on the roads.
To conclude
, I think, the budget should be disparted between both railways and ways.
Nevertheless
, most governments would only take one side to be urgent.
Submitted by Sarah_nazari on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

task response
Focus on clearly addressing the prompt by expressing your opinion on whether governments should spend more on railways or roads.
coherence cohesion
Ensure a stronger logical structure by organizing your ideas in a more coherent and connected way. Use transitions to link your points together and improve the flow of the essay.
Topic Vocabulary:
  • Carbon emissions
  • Mass transportation
  • Traffic congestion
  • Economic growth
  • Regional development
  • Initial investment
  • Feasibility
  • Flexibility
  • Rural areas
  • Integration
  • Sustainable
  • Efficiency
  • Infrastructure
  • Commuters
  • Public expenditure
  • Autonomous vehicles
  • Long-term investment
  • Accessibility
  • Connectivity
  • Modal shift
What to do next:
Look at other essays: