Many countries spend a lot of money in the arts. Some people think investment in the arts is necessary, but others say money is better spent on public service and facilities. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Recently, governments have increased their investment in the
arts
, but
this
move is seen as controversial. Some believe that investing in public
services
and facilities is the right way to use the money, while supporters argue that the critical impact of the
arts
on the public is often overlooked and that it is good to have supportive governments.
This
essay will discuss both sides of the argument and give my view. From the opponents' point of view, the majority of citizens cannot appreciate the
arts
due to a lack of good education. The urgent task at hand should not be to build museums and exhibitions but to focus financial expenditure on improving the material living standards of citizens by upgrading public
services
and infrastructure. At the same time, with the wealthy already subsidising the development of the
arts
, it would be wasteful for the government to spend its limited public coffers for the same purpose.
On the other hand
, proponents of the development of the
arts
suggest that there is no substitute for the influence of the
arts
on the general public. The majority of the nation indeed lacks a good appreciation of the
arts
.
This
is why it is essential to develop the
arts
, particularly to popularise
arts
education. The
arts
should not be the privilege of the upper classes. They have a unique role to play in inspiring minds and enhancing creativity so that everyone can profit from them and positively influence the future of society. More importantly, it is not that supporting the
arts
means disregarding basic
services
, both of which are the responsibility of the government, and
therefore
should not take away from investing in the
arts
to develop infrastructure. In conclusion, I reiterate my belief that the public should value the material base as well as the spiritual wealth and should not look only at short-term profits and
thus
change investment in the
arts
to one in public
services
.
Submitted by baozilyn on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: